The arriving company had already divided
Ringrose’s Nicoya chapter follows the departure of the party returning across the isthmus. The people remaining aboard continued northward, fished, collected rainwater and altered the vessel’s upper works. The force entering the gulf was smaller than the earlier company. [1]
That change helps explain the value of manageable craft. Another large hull could add work as well as capacity when fewer men were available.
The tide moved the ship when the wind did not
The narrative describes drifting farther into the gulf with the tide, checking the depth and backing off when the water became shallow. Meanwhile canoes went to places the main vessel did not reach. [1]
A gulf’s size is therefore a poor guide to the freedom of a particular ship inside it. Draft, depth, tide and access to a creek could determine the practical route.
A report from a canoe redirected the party
Near Chira, a canoe returned asking for men and arms after two vessels were seen farther up. Part of the company went ashore while others guarded prisoners. The party then ascended a creek and took the barks by surprise. [1]
The sequence depended on distributed observation. The captain aboard the main ship did not have a direct view of every opportunity inside the gulf.
The prizes had previous histories
Ringrose identifies one bark as a vessel the company had already taken earlier near Panama. Its appearance here warns against assuming that each new capture was a newly encountered hull. Captured vessels could be released and meet the company again. [1]
The following chapter judges a bark from Nicoya faster than the principal vessel. A smaller prize could be valuable for its sailing qualities and practical use, independently of a spectacular cargo.
Keep the place inside a working network
The visit links boats, soundings, prisoners, supplies and subsequent repairs at Golfo Dulce. It is more informative to follow those tasks than to label the whole gulf a pirate base.
This account is confined to the historical visit. It supplies neither modern water depths nor current visitor or anchoring advice.
Questions, answered.
Could the main ship reach every creek that the canoes could?
No. The narrative shows different craft doing different work, constrained by depth and access.
Was every capture a different vessel?
No. Ringrose identifies one bark as a vessel previously captured near Panama.
Sources & reading notes
Source checks distinguish an artifact, a reported account and a modern interpretation. They do not constitute independent historian review.
- Bucaniers of America, the second volume (1685)Open the keyboarded source transcriptionBasil Ringrose; printed for William Crooke; EEBO–TCP transcription · Participant voyage narrative, published 1685; CC0 keyboarded transcription
Chapter XVIII, the approach after the April separation, upper-deck alterations, sounding and movement in the gulf, Chira, prisoners and two captured barks; Chapter XIX for comparison of the bark’s sailing with the main vessel. The published journal is a mediated participant account. Its nationalist praise, judgments about peoples and claims about motives are not adopted as neutral fact. The XML marks damaged and missing text; page images are not the CC0 transcription.
See the details.Careening: the work that made a ship vulnerableExplore the illustrated guide